Health / MedicalYour Field & CID
How The Health & Medical Field Benefits from CID
There is a multitude of information being disseminated in the medical field that contain information lacking clarity for its readers.
The results are misunderstandings, miscommunication & frustration for the readers.
These result in a myriad of experiences ranging from mild annoyances to fatal mistakes.
Why is CID needed?
To improve the clarity of information for
in order to lessen the number of mistakes, improve the quality of health care & medical research while lowering medical costs.
Therefore, the following groups could benefit from creating cognitive-based materials:
Medical Schools & Teaching Hospitals
Medical Education & Training companies
Medical Research Clinics
Medical-device & Biotech Manufacturers
Pharmaceutical companies/ Drug Industry
Publishers of medical information
Patients, employees & administrators are being inundated with information yet the majority of U.S. adults may have difficulty or cannot properly interpret or correctly understand what they are reading.
The health field needs to effectively treat people on-site & provide information for self-care that patients can understand & follow accurately.
Employees & staff need to have ease of access to information that provides clarity & stable information.
CID formats would help people accurately interpret visual & written information.
Communications in the Health Medical fields
needs to improve for the following reasons:
“…Three industries had more than 100,000 incidents in 2012: health care and social assistance (168,360), manufacturing (125,280), and retail trade (125,650)…
In health care and social assistance, musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) made up 42 percent of cases and had a rate of 55 cases per 10,000 full-time workers. This rate was 56 percent higher than the rate for all private industries…”
Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh2.nr0.htm
Communication Errors in Radiology: A Liability Cost Analysis
“…The average indemnity payment for primary errors in communication by radiologists was between $228,000 and $236,000…twice as high as when appropriate communication occurred.
As a percentage of total indemnity payments to plaintiffs, such awards were 15 times higher than when communication was effective.
Preventable Medical Mistakes Account for One-Sixth of All Annual Deaths in the U.S.
“According to the most recent research1 into the cost of medical mistakes in terms of lives lost, 210,000 Americans are killed by
preventable hospital errors each year.
When deaths related to diagnostic errors, errors of omission, and failure to follow guidelines are included, the number skyrockets to an estimated 440,000 preventable hospital deaths each year.
This is more than 4.5 times higher than 1999 estimates published by the Institute of Medicine (IOM),2 and makes medical errors the third-leading cause of death in the US, right after heart disease and cancer. As reported by the featured article in Scientific American:
3“The new estimates were developed by John T. James, a toxicologist at NASA’s space center in Houston who runs an advocacy organization called Patient Safety America…[A] spokesman for the American Hospital Association said the group has more confidence in the IOM’s estimate of 98,000 deaths. ProPublica asked three prominent patient safety researchers to review James’ study, however, and all said his methods and findings were credible.”
Retrospective analysis of mortalities associated with medication errors
“ The most common types of errors resulting in patient death involved administering an improper dose (40.9%), administering the wrong drug (16%), and using the wrong route of administration (9.5%).
The most common causes of errors were performance and knowledge deficits (44%) and communication errors (15.8%)…”
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy.
Retrieved from http://ajhp.org/content/58/19/1835.short
Nurse & Physician Communication
Healthy Work Environments, Nurse-Physician Communication, and Patients’ Outcomes
“Adverse events and serious errors are common in critical care. Although factors in the work environment are important predictors of adverse outcomes for patients, communication between nurses and physicians may be the most significant factor associated with excess hospital mortality in critical care settings. “
American Journal Critical Care November 2007 vol. 16 no. 6 536-543
“Nurses performed 46 different tasks at a rate of 23.4 tasks per hour. The information needed to perform the most common tasks was often inaccessible, difficult to see at a distance or located on multiple monitoring devices. Current devices at the ICU bedside do not adequately support a nurse’s information-gathering activities…
Conclusion – Integrated information that enhances nurses’ Situation Awareness may decrease errors and improve patient safety in the future…
[The] information nurses use to conduct these various tasks is located in many different places and in many different forms contributes significantly to information overload.”
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Associationjamia.bmj.com
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:583-590 doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000678
Authors Tamayo Kazaokaa, Kuniko Ohtsukab, Kuniko Uenoc, Misato Morid
a Seirei Christopher College, Mikatahara 3453, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 433-8558, Japan
b The Japanese Red Cross Kyushu, International College of Nursing, Japan
c Kanagawa Cancer Center, Japan
d Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Japan][When] requests for medication between nurses happen
[the study indicated that] …
Nurses have a communication problem…”
The purpose of this study was to investigate about the communication problems in the team nursing systems…Baseline data was collected from 100 third-year nursing students and 163 nurses of two municipal hospitals further subdivided into three groups by their service years. The responders attributing to the errors in the simulation were compared.
As a result, the more service years the fewer nurses there were who attributed medication errors to no explanation and no confirmation between nurses. The nurses whose service years were less than five years had a low level of awareness regarding no explanation of a nurse leader requesting the medications as well as the students.]
Overall, 169 of 394 non–surgical-site infections (42.9%) developed during or within 48 hours after a stay in a critical care unit; 167 (42.4%) developed during or within 48 hours after a stay in a non-nursery ward.
Source of Mistakes
Statistics on errors in UK hospitals by the Medical and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
MHRA did a root cause analysis of why the human errors happened. You can see their report here, I have slightly simplified their information to identify the six areas below:
Process or procedure incorrect (22%)
Procedural steps omitted (23%)
Concentration error (29%)
Training misunderstood – it covered the area of the error but was misunderstood (15%)
Training missing – out of date or did not cover the area (6%)
Poor communication/rushing (5%)
Source: To Your Health! To err is human but assessments can help by John Kleeman. Retrieved from https://www.questionmark.com
According to an infographic based on data from multiple sources, created by Jonathan Govette1:
- 3 out of 10 lab tests are reordered because the results can’t be found
- 68 percent of specialists receive no information from the primary care provider prior to the referral visit
- 60 to 70 percent of referrals go unscheduled
- 25 percent of appointments are missed
- 7,000 people die every year from sloppy physician handwriting
Health Care System
We’re Last! Again! U.S. Health Care Ranks Poorly
BY MAGGIE FOX Senior health writer for NBCNews.com and TODAY.com
The latest look at the U.S. health care system compared to other rich countries shows — yet again —that the United States comes in dead last.
Americans spend far more per person on medical care, yet are less healthy than people in 10 other countries. The system is less fair than systems in other rich countries and it’s far less efficient, ranking last of 11 nations, the Commonwealth Fund report reads.
The nonprofit Commonwealth Fund has been publishing its report —based on data from the World Health Organization, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and its own research — for a decade.]“Among the 11 nations studied in this report
Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
…the U.S. ranks last, as it did in the 2010, 2007, 2006, and 2004 editions,” the report reads.
“Most troubling, the U.S. fails to achieve better health outcomes than the other countries, and as shown in the earlier editions, the U.S. is last or near last on dimensions of access, efficiency, and equity.”
“On indicators of efficiency, the U.S. ranks last among the 11 countries, with the U.K. and Sweden ranking first and second…”
Americans aren’t living any longer, either.
“The U.S. and U.K. had much higher death rates in 2007 from conditions amenable to medical care than some of the other countries, e.g., rates 25 percent to 50 percent higher than Australia and Sweden. Overall, France, Sweden, and Switzerland rank highest on healthy lives,” the report reads….]First published June 16th 2014, 8:58 am
Americans Are the Most Frequent Victims of Medical Errors
It can be argued that medical errors are leading cause of death in the US—higher than heart disease, higher than cancer. The latest review17 shows that about 1,000 people die EVERY DAY from hospital mistakes alone. This equates to four jumbo jets’ worth of passengers every week, but the death toll is largely ignored.
Types of errors include inappropriate medical treatments, hospital-acquired infections, unnecessary surgeries, adverse drug reactions, operating on the wrong body part—or even on the wrong patient!
One in four hospital patients are harmed by preventable medical mistakes in this country, and 800,000 people die every year as a result.
Of those 800,000, 250,000 die as a result of medication errors.
Patient Medication Errors
Observation of Medication Errors Made by Diabetic Patients in the Home
Julia D Watkins, RN, MPH, Doris E Roberts, RN, PhD,
T Franklin Williams, MD, Dan A Martin, MD and
Departments of Public Health Nursing, Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine and Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, N.C.
58% of 115 patients taking insulin made dosage errors.
Rates of error were similar in clinic and in private patients.
Observations for accuracy in carrying out prescribed medication regimens were made at home on two groups of diabetic patients.
The first group included sixty patients (all taking insulin and cared for in two university clinics), and the second 102 patients (fifty-five taking insulin and forty-seven taking oral hypoglycemic agents) cared for in two university clinics, a voluntary hospital clinic, and twenty-two different private practices.
Fifty-eight per cent of 115 patients taking insulin made dosage errors. “Potentially serious” errors, i.e., those in which the measured dose differed from the prescribed dosage by 15 per cent or more, occurred in 35 per cent. In the first group, seven of thirty-four patients (21 per cent) using the U40-U80 “convertible” syringe measured either half or twice the prescribed dose through use of the wrong scale. Rates of error were similar in clinic and in private patients. The frequency of insulin errors increased with duration of known diabetes.
Among forty-seven patients taking oral drugs, 23 per cent made “potentially serious” errors, and 26 per cent reported missing one dose or more per month. The findings indicate the need for more extensive knowledge of what the diabetic patient does at home, for seeking the reasons for his behavior, and for finding ways to achieve sustained-improved performance.
Diabetes Journal December 1967 vol. 16 no. 12 882-885
How accurate can the findings be from medical research using human subjects when studies show that 87% of US adults score below proficient in reading literacy?
Knowing this statistic behooves designers of research to present clear & stable information to human subjects to ensure subjects accurately understand instructions in order to garner results that actually respond to your queries.
For example click here to see before and after examples of instructions for research subjects participating in fMRI studies.
“We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once.”
30th U.S. president
Keep Me Informed
Stay up-to-date with news and current research from CID.
The CID Group LLC values your privacy. Your contact information will not be shared with other parties.